Fortunate people, in business-speak, have value-added lives. The value added is often intangible, like ideas and experiences. For example, we talk about our personal philosophy by repeating the words or deeds that were imparted to us. Although it's not always the case, these are usually the voices of the elders. These are the common variety of authority figures, from the past and in the present. For the most part, we revere these voices. When fully integrated, it becomes the sound of our own voices. Parents talk about the surreal experience of hearing themselves saying to their children the same things their parent said to them when they were children. For example, “This is the last time I'll tell you to...” The voices of the elders, however, are not always benign.
Most of us would describe the voice we hear as neutral if not helpful. Yet, there are many examples of the elder voices that encourage us to live below our potential. In the words of the Poet Rudyard Kipling, they tell us “[a]ll good people say, All nice people like Us, are We And everyone else is They …” These are the seeds of hate. In another instant, they tell us is our lot to slave then to die; these are the words of despair. Having studied, however, and having been tested, we hear the words of Longfellow, “Life is real, Life is earnest, and the grave is not its goal, From dust thou art to dust returnest was not spoken of the soul,” In other words, in each of us is a innate need to progress or at the least, maintain the status quo. How, then, is this shift possible unless we exercise our critical faculties.
Our conversations will change and so will our sense of good fortune, only after we add the right measure of criticism to these dialogues. To accomplish this we must necessarily become dispassionate observers of our thoughts and behaviors, products of the voices we hear. I suppose that the iconoclast will have little difficulty challenging the voice of tradition. The puritan, on the other hand, will suffer great pains to act in a way that seems to disrespect the elders. Although, we might not self-describe as puritanical, some of us will struggle with challenging the voice of the elders. Yet, our spiritual, or what may be described as the enlightened self, calls us to evaluate the voices we hear.
It is inevitable that our voice will one day become the voices in the heads of our children. So, it’s in our self-interest to continue to raise the bar; to seek to understand more deeply who we are, and the impact we will have in the lives of others, now and in the future. Let us, then, check those traditions that have been passed down from generation-to-generation for efficacy, to see if there be any value.
3 comments:
looks real good, you've been working on it
I do not think that in our day and age, we can speak of being critical or challenging the wisdom of our elders; without taking into consideration the historical, and sociological transitions that have occurred in America, in the last 60 years. America has relatively recently come out of a cultural revolution, where in the 60's and 70's, the child revolted against thinking of its elder. At the time, we thought we were on the verge of progress. But what if we threw out the baby with the bath water. The children of this age are now the elders of today. One problem we may find, and I mean might, is that the elders that we know today prescribe to a way of thinking that has turned out to be wrong, and that some of the ways of the previous generation may actually have been right. For example, as a personal observation, I've noticed that many (not all) people who were born in the 50's, 60's, and maybe early 70's, answer to almost any situation is that "We should revolt". I've always felt that revolting may be good in some situations, but in other ones we need stability. I think sometimes we can get locked into one way of thinking, that can keep us from seeing the greater picture.
Post a Comment